Posted in Sit/Lie
Last updated 04/07/2011 at 5:27 p.m. PDT

Haight Leads in Sit/Lie Citations

Initial enforcement figures show 86 warnings and 16 tickets citywide

  • Text Size
  • A
  • A
  • A
By on April 6, 2011 - 7:57 p.m. PDT

Haight Dwellers screencap
James Irwin for The Bay Citizen
Frustration with transients in the Haight neighborhood sparked a grass-roots effort to pass the sit/lie measure

In the three weeks after San Francisco police began enforcing the controversial Civil Sidewalks ordinance last month, officers issued 86 warnings and 16 citations to people who were sitting or lying down on city sidewalks, police said. 

Most of the tickets were handed out in the Park police district, which includes the Haight neighborhood where a grass-roots effort to pass the ordinance grew out of frustration with aggressive transients on the streets.

The measure, which passed with 54 percent of the vote in November, officially took effect in December. Enforcement was pushed back to the second week of March to give the department time to train officers and complete other preparations.

When officers encounter someone who appears to be violating the law by sitting or lying down on the sidewalk between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m., they first inform them of the law and ask them to get up. Repeat offenders incur an official warning and receive a card with information about services including shelters and medical clinics. If the offender persists, a citation is issued; the first ticket can lead to a penalty of $50 to $100; subsequent convictions can be punished by fines of up to $500 and as many as 30 days in jail.

Related

The enforcement data, the most recent available from the police department, covers the period ending March 31.

The largest number of warnings, 18, along with two citations, took place in the tourist-heavy Central district, home to North Beach, Chinatown and Fisherman’s Wharf.

The figures for the Park district — which includes Haight-Ashbury and part of Golden Gate Park — suggest that area had more repeat offenders than other neighborhoods.

As of March 23, there were 10 warnings and no citations in the Park district. The next week, an additional six warnings and 11 tickets were handed out.

“You would assume that those warnings turned into citations,” said Lt. Troy Dangerfield, a police spokesman. “People didn’t comply, so they got cited.”

The Richmond police district, which includes the Richmond neighborhood and most of Golden Gate Park, had 15 warnings. It's unclear whether those admonitions took place in the neighborhood or the park. Dangerfield said the department is working to make more precise locations of enforcement activity available.

The Southern district, which covers the South of Market area, had 15 warnings and one citation. The Tenderloin had 12 warnings, and the Mission police district had 10 warnings and two citations.

No warnings or tickets were recorded for the largely residential Northern, Taraval, Ingleside and Bayview districts.

Zoe Corneli
I was a founding online editor of The Bay Citizen. Previously, I helped create the daily local news magazine Crosscurrents from KALW Public Radio, where I reported, edited and produced radio stories and managed the ... View Profile
DR WAYNE B LANIER
DR WAYNE B LANIER
wrote on 04/07/2011 at 5:27 p.m. PDT

As a former 33-year resident of the Haight and Ashbury Street house owner, I am saddened by the Sit/Lie enablement law.

Not because the lay-abouts were not an irritant. Stepping over them while ambling along Haight Street was annoying. But... Because yet another Police Enabling Law, which will not solve the problem over the long term, is a bad precedent. All enabling laws are bad.

There was already an adequate law, but it required the offended address to press charges. The reality was that many of the Merchants along Haight Street were too cowardly to press charges. They wanted the Police to take the hit for them.

For awhile, now, the Police will be forced to apply this idiotic law. Mostly to no avail, since the predominately-homeless offenders cannot pay the fines. Repeatedly, such enabling laws, all across the United States and throughout its history, have proved ineffective for the original problem. What they do, however, is enable the Police to discriminate against an unpopular target.

"Loitering Laws" were, for awhile, such enabling laws. They were used to clear people of unfortunately dark skin color from nice white neighborhoods. And, in many of the same areas, to keep out "white trash".

With no complaint, there is little cause to clear persons from sitting on the sidewalk. I can flat out tell you, if a certain owner were to sit on the sidewalk in front of his excellent Haight Ashbury Market, no cop is going to move him. Furthermore, I cannot imagine that sturdy Greek owner being so cowardly as to not deal quickly with the situation if some lay-about sat in front of the entrance to the the Haight Ashbury Market. "Παρακαλούνται κίνηση άχρηστο σώμα σας από την πόρτα μου ...! Τώρα ...!"

Many of the other store owners, however, lack this courage. They want to Fuzz to do the dirty work. In the end, the effort will fail.

Related Content