Posted in Pension Reform
Last updated 03/29/2011 at 11:15 a.m. PDT

Report: SF Pension Crisis Much Worse than City Claims

Adachi-commissioned analysis puts gap at $6.8 billion--not official figure of $1.6 billion

  • Text Size
  • A
  • A
  • A
By on March 15, 2011 - 10:00 a.m. PDT
Adithya Sambamurthy/The Bay Citizen
Jeff Adachi, center, speaks to members of the West Twin Peaks Council during a debate on Proposition B with Tim Paulson, Executive Director of the San Francisco Labor Council, on Monday, September 27, 2010

San Francisco's public-employee pension fund is in weaker shape than many people realize, according to an analysis by Stanford University Professor Joe Nation released Tuesday. It is underfunded by some $6.8 billion, Nation's report finds.

The city's pension fund is officially underfunded by $1.6 billion. Nation's study argues that the pension fund is relying on a 7.75 percent annual rate of return that is unrealistic over the long term. The study argues for 6.2 percent, which it says was the average rate of return in the capital markets from 1900 through 1999. 

The study was commissioned by city Public Defender Jeff Adachi, who is readying a ballot initiative to address the city's ballooning employee pension- and benefits costs. Nation was a member of the state Assembly from Marin County until 2006, and he has become a prominent authority on public finance issues since joining Stanford's Institute for Economic Policy Research.

Related

Tom O'Connor, head of the San Francisco Fire Fighters Union, dismissed the findings. 

"All Joe Nation and Jeff Adachi are doing is throwing gas on the fire. Our pension fund needs help, but it's not as bad as they both claim."

The study released Tuesday says that, on a per household basis, San Franciscans are shouldering the most-severe pension shortfall in the state, at $35,000 per household. In Los Angeles, the pension liability works out to only about $7,500 per household. 

1 2 Next Page 
Related Content