Businesses Pressure Lee to Evict Occupy
Labor groups urge SF mayor to let the encampment remain
Several commercial real estate developers have quietly threatened to sue San Francisco for economic losses stemming from the Occupy San Francisco encampment at Justin Herman Plaza.
The group of about a half dozen property managers around the plaza has repeatedly lobbied the mayor to evict the camp, culminating in talks Monday at City Hall with Lee and his chief of staff, Steve Kawa.
The meeting included representatives from the Hyatt Hotels, Boston Properties, which owns the Embarcadero Center, and the consortium that manages the Ferry Building.
“It’s gotten out of hand,” said the meeting organizer, Ken Cleaveland, the head of the Building Owners and Managers Association, a commercial real estate lobbying group that represents the participating property owners. “He needs to exert his leadership as mayor. Enough is enough.”
Cleaveland’s group is one of the most powerful political organizations in the city; it gave $50,000 to an independent political action committee that, among other things, supported Lee's campaign for mayor.
The mounting pressure from the group, which represents businesses that pay $1.6 billion in real estate taxes to the city, poses a political dilemma for the mayor, who remains wary of a repeat of the violent confrontations in Oakland three weeks ago.
Before the election, the business community's support allowed Lee to delay evicting Occupy SF. When the developers of the Ferry Building threatened to hold a press conference to pressure the mayor to evict the camp, other BOMA members squashed the idea, concerned it would would hurt Lee, their chosen candidate.
Immediately after the election, the group remained divided about what actions to recommend.
“People are in this weird spot where their buddy just got elected. He’s our guy,” said one political observer.
With the holiday shopping season under way, the business group's patience has run out, just as the mayor is facing new pressure to allow the encampment to remain.
On Thursday, leaders from 13 labor and community organizations — from the San Francisco Labor Council to the California Nurses Association to La Raza Centro Legal — wrote a letter urging Lee to let the encampment stand.
Gabriel Haaland, a political director of SEIU 1021, the largest union in San Francisco, said the union was fully committed to supporting the movement and urged Lee to “not get caught up in the code violations” as a reason to evict the encampment.
“We’re signing people up to turn out in solidarity the next time there’s a callout,” Haaland said.
Lee this week attempted to broker a compromise with demonstrators, saying he would let the encampment stay if protesters reduced the number of tents to below 100 and cleaned up the camp — which they have done to some extent.
Still, an eviction appears imminent. Protesters on Thursday braced for a raid after receiving notice from the city that the plaza had become a “public health nuisance.”
Christine Falvey, the mayor’s spokeswoman, said city officials were touring the camp late Friday but the mayor had not yet made a determination to evict the protesters.
“There have been marked improvements the last day or so but they still haven’t complied with the guidelines as of early today,” Falvey said Friday evening. “The mayor takes businesses’ complaints very seriously, especially the small businesses and vendors. He agrees that a long-term encampment cannot go on, but he supports the protesters’ First Amendment rights."
There are signs that the Occupy movement has succeeded in reframing the political discourse, as business leaders have begun to accept its existence — if grudgingly.
One lobbyist representing some of San Francisco’s largest corporations said the muted reaction of big businesses in the city after protesters rushed into a downtown Bank of America branch on Wednesday and pitched a tent was surprising.
Aside from the building managers around Justin Herman Plaza, the lobbyist said, “There hasn’t been any freak-outs because by now they’ve had to deal with this in other places.”
Cleaveland said he hopes the mayor listens to his group's concerns — and takes action soon.
“I do think we should be paid attention to,” said Cleaveland. “But it has nothing to do with our political contributions. We expect the mayor to look at the interests of everybody in the city and not just a few hundred malcontents. That camp out there is inappropriate and it is wrong.”








M L
It ain't just businesses. Its a lot of people who check it out to see the solidarity, and flee when they see the reality.
Mission Rosalind
Mayor Lee should move Occupy SF up to Civic Center Plaza and let 'em stay there as long as they want. That area is a homeless focal point already, Chris Daly's bar has bathrooms they can use, and all demonstrations will be right under the noses of the Supervisors. Even better, it's GREEN--the drug dealers serving the encampment won't have to drive downtown anymore, marches on the Federal and State office buildings will stall fewer cars along Market, and the "progressive" politicians can walk to their Occupy photo ops rather than driving.
It's a WIN-WIN-WIN!!!
Chance Stickem
Could this possibly be any more transparent? The 1% want their bought and paid for mayor to stifle the political voices calling for an end to their stranglehold on power, wealth and ownership in San Francisco.
Thơmas Jơachim Garçon
Ironically, money influencing politics and then politics deciding for money and against humans is exactly what this whole movement is about.
In 'the greatest nation on earth' 1/6 of the US population is on food stamps, and every third child is growing up in poverty.
America, you are better than that.
Clark Sullivan
Funny how my comments are posted on Facebook, but deleted from this web site. The Bay Citizen is nothing but a front for the 1%. I will never donate to this site. Censorship is alive and well.
Clark Sullivan
$50,000, to afford such a campaign donation, you must be a part of the 1%.
SteveL Images
Why has OccupySF become a homeless camp? It's because the OccupySF camp at Justin Herman plaza has become the only place in town a down-and-outer can get a decent meal and decent health care (professional nurses come in and attend to all twice a week).
Where did the homeless come from? They were already there, living under the freeway. Anyone who wants the OccupySF camp raided is saying that they want the homeless to go disappear back under a freeway overpass. Take away their meals, take away their health care. As long as they're not visible.
This is not a morally defensible position. The OccupySF camp is turning the spotlight on the plight of the homeless. We spend trillions of dollars for drone wars and banker bailouts; pennies for the least fortunate among us.
I'm gratified to see Mayor Lee beging to speak some common sense. He said that without a long term solution for the camp, if you raid, the campers just come back angrier. Perhaps just like Mayor Quan in Oakland, Mayor Lee is seeing that once he's in office, he's responsible for all the people, not just those who supported him.
In Quan's case, we have a progressive mayor having to take a hard line; and in Lee's case, a Chamber of Commerce mayor realizing that it's not so easy to make the homeless disappear.
Paul S
If the encampment is evicted, I will work tirelessly to inform as many people as I can of the causal role of the Hyatt, the Embarcadero Center and the Ferry Building in the eviction, and suggest that people boycott these businesses as a gesture of solidarity with the 99%. I will inform business owners in these venues, so they are aware of what is happening and why. Thus they have the option to act on the situation.
I suggest this course of action to others too. Make it viral, but be sure you let businesses know why you are boycotting them. It's only fair they have the opportunity to reverse the boycott. Economic pressure is an effective way for consumers to cause change.
Mission Rosalind
If you are indeed contacting businesses you intend to boycott, here are some questions I think you should consider including in your discussions:
1. Who owns the business? Is it locally owned?
2. What is the relationship of the business to the owner of the building in which it's located?
3. How many people does the business employ?
4. What local business groups, such as the Chamber of Commerce, does the business belong to?
5. How has the Occupy encampment affected the business?
Why is this important? Because boycotting a TENANT is not the same as boycotting a LANDLORD. If you act, act with knowledge.