Bay Area Politicos: Bank Settlement Falls Short
One congressman says foreclosure proposal is "a drop in the bucket"
Some of President Barack Obama’s closest allies in the Bay Area are blasting his latest $25 billion proposal to settle with allegedly abusive mortgage servicers, charging the administration with shortchanging desperate homeowners while coddling the nation’s largest banks.
“It’s a drop in the bucket,” Rep. George Miller said of the proposed deal, under which five banks would provide restitution in exchange for a release from further civil liability.
Nationally, Miller said, about 10 million American borrowers collectively owe $700 billion more on their homes than the homes are worth. Administration officials have said the $25 billion settlement would help about one million families, which means that a fraction of the borrowers would get an estimated $20,000 write down on each of their mortgages.
“We don’t approve of the settlement,” said Rep. Anna Eshoo, who last Thursday joined Miller and 25 other members of California’s congressional delegation in demanding a meeting with Obama to discuss housing issues.
In an op-ed published Monday, the president’s former green jobs czar, Oakland activist Van Jones, argued that Obama could prove that he’s “serious about solving this crisis” by forcing banks to “pay a minimum of $300 billion in principal reduction for homeowners with underwater mortgages and/or restitution for foreclosed-on families.”
Web-based advocacy groups also have been pushing for a stronger deal. Daniel Mintz, a campaign coordinator with MoveOn.org, said more than 400,000 signatures had been gathered on petitions urging Obama to “hold Wall Street banks accountable by fully investigating the housing crisis” rather than a “sweetheart deal that lets them off the hook.”
The flare of opposition comes as the administration struggles to wrap up a year of negotiations over alleged fraudulent foreclosure practices at the nation’s five largest mortgage servicers.
Last week, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan told the U.S. Conference of Mayors he was “very close” to a deal, which he said would “help over a million families around the country stay in their homes and get help.”
On Monday, Donovan and Associate U.S. Attorney General Thomas Perrelli briefed Democratic and Republic state attorneys general on the outlines of a $25 billion settlement.
Geoff Greenwood, spokesman for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, who is leading negotiations on behalf of attorneys general from all 50 states, said in an email that no deal was imminent, despite Donovan’s optimism. “AGs will need time to review materials,” he said.
Greenwood said two separate agreements have been proposed: one which includes California and one that doesn’t. In September, California’s Attorney General Kamala Harris walked out of settlement talks saying the proposed deal at the time was too weak. On Monday, her spokesman, Shum Preston, said Harris would be approaching any new proposal cautiously.
"Attorney General Harris has consistently and repeatedly expressed concern about protecting her ability to investigate wrongdoing in the mortgage arena, and that remains a key lens through which she will evaluate any proposals,” Preston said.
In an interview, Eshoo said she believed senior officials in the administration did not take the crisis seriously. She complained that earlier meetings with Donovan, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, and Edward DeMarco, the acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which regulates Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, had been “extremely frustrating.”
On Oct. 6, Eshoo said, four House members from Northern California — Eshoo, Miller, and Reps. Mike Thompson (D-Napa) and Doris Matsui (D-Sacramento), met with DeMarco to urge him to do more to help struggling homeowners. They asked the chief of the finance agency if he had “ever met with a any family that has undergone a foreclosure.”
Eshoo said DeMarco said he had not.
“They just don’t get it,” Eshoo said.
Eshoo said she hadn’t heard back about the proposed meeting with Obama. White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage refused to comment on the demand, but she said the President remains committed to solving the housing crisis.
“From day one the President has worked to stabilize the housing market and help responsible homeowners stay in their homes, including through refinancing efforts, foreclosure prevention programs and programs directed at the hardest hit states,” she said. “The President will continue to expand on these efforts and look at new ways to help homeowners.”







Roger Barnett
This issue is Obama's Achilles heel. He seems incapable of treating the banks correctly, just minuscule settlements with no admission of wrongdoing. How lame! Will he get tougher if re-elected this year, do we wait to find out, can we afford to wait? This should be the focus of the re-election campaign; it is the even greater weakness of Romney, or Gingrich, who would do nothing on this matter. Or, in the end, has our President taken too much of the financial world's money. If so, how sad.
David Zisser
So the usual cabal of Democrat Party parasites are out to extort money from the banks to give unjustified largesse to the dimwits who now find themselves underwater on their home loans. Why not just give them free houses which they can then re-encumber so they can buy new cars, take trips and generally have a great time on other peoples' money until the dough runs out once again.
It never seems to occur to these Dems that the banks operate under lending rules established by various Democrat presidents and Congresses extending back to that ultimate fool, Jimmy Carter. Have they forgotten the Community Reinvestment Act which has been used by various shake-down artists and/or race hucksters -- read Jesse Jackson --over the many years to enrich their own power base? Miller, Thompson and Eshoo are such dishonest demagogues and won't acknowledge the role of individual responsibility in this mortgage situation. Of course, they realize that those of us who act responsibily aren't going to vote for them in any event so why not pander to the irresponsible.
What a pathetic state of affairs.
Rudolph Fernandez
Location, location, location.... Cost of living.... These factors have allowed realtors, appraisers, banks etc., to cheat despite lending rules and the Community Reinvestment Act. Much like a dog that barks, but does not bite, our government needs to have Fighto sic`um.....
Helene Gelber-Lehman
I've never been prouder to be a constituent of Congressman Miller than now! MOST OF US WHO NEED LOAN MODIFICATIONS ARE BEING REFUSED BY THE BANKS! I am amongst those who's home is "under water" and cannot refinance because, even though I was never late on a credit card or mortgage payment, the banks reduced my credit limit to what I owed, thereby destroying my FICO score [Debt-credit ratio] . The bank wouldn't let me have a loan modification so, to keep my home, I am be bled dry [I lived on a fixed income] paying a higher interest rate to keep my home, while illegal aliens are buying up homes all around me for cash paying far less than my mortgage, and are harboring 3-5 illegal families in these homes with 10 cars, blasting their mariachi Music, and they are not only laundering their ill-gotten gains by pooling their cash to buy back these homes at bargain-basement prices, but also further destroying our property values. They seem to be immune to our laws; our building codes [they destroyed many homes they bought with fraudulent T.I.N. #'s by doing inferior work without permits]; our federal immigration laws, fraud statutes etc. while laughing at us stupid "gringos" who they charge 25 X's more than they charge their own. for everything.
If Obama wants my vote in November, he will have to get tougher with the banks, forcing them to give loan modifications to those of us who most need them, and get tougher with illegal immigrants who are wreaking havoc with our laws and destroying our communities.
Rudolph Fernandez
I am Hispanic and I totally agree with you... You are correct about a lot of what you say here... One thing though, the banks need to be forced to give you your home. Balance PAID IN FULL! And they also owe you for countless damages that have caused you loss. You are an awesome citizen. I truly mean it.
Ann Garrison
@David Zisser: You're missing something. The banks did not "operate under lending rules established by various Democrat presidents and Congresses." They did not abide by the law. They broke the law all over the place, far more, I believe, than even Kamala Harris begins to know yet because I don't think she's looked into the asset purchase agreements that preceded the predatory lending, securitization, foreclosure rampage.
Homeowners did not create the housing bubble that the big investment banks, whose execs knew what a scam it was, bet against.
Rudolph Fernandez
You are soooooo smart! :) Bravo! You rock!
Rudolph Fernandez
I voted for you Mr. Miller..... And I am glad I did.... Go get 'um, Boi!!!!!!
Rudolph Fernandez
Obama! I voted for you! You need to make it so that the banks bail out the government.... They should pay off all of our debt! Zero balance! !No se debe nada! !Cuenta pagada! !Intienda, Buey! And regulate, regulate, regulate!!!!
!No mames!