Posted in Education
Last updated 11/17/2011 at 12:21 a.m. PST

95 Arrested after Protesters Pitch Tent in Bank

Hundreds marched in downtown San Francisco against education cuts

  • Text Size
  • A
  • A
  • A
By Matt Smith on November 16, 2011 - 3:01 p.m. PST

San Francisco police arrested 95 people, including three minors, after protesters took over a Bank of America branch Wednesday afternoon.

About 100 demonstrators filled the branch at 50 California St. in San Francisco as part of a march to protest cuts to public education, while several hundred others crowded the street outside the bank.

Some protesters set up a tent on the bank floor. Others stood on furniture, including the loan officer's desk, stamping their feet and chanting, “You broke it, you bought it, the bailout is bullshit.”

A banner spread out on the floor of the branch read, “Seize the banks, end the dictatorship of the 1 percent.”

Protesters told a bank employee they wanted to speak with Monica Lozano, a member of the University of California Board of Regents who is also on the board of Bank of America.

The bank employee, who was wearing a suit and tie, told the group, “I need you guys to please leave.”

At about 2:45 p.m., approximately 20 police officers dressed in riot gear entered the branch, while roughly 40 more arrived and stood outside.

Sgt. Michael Andraychak, a spokesman for the San Francisco Police Department, said that when the officers who were outside attempted to enter the bank, a group of protesters surged forward, pinning a lieutenant in a doorway and several other officers against the bank's windows.

Protesters threw bottles at officers, shouted "Get the police," and attempted to grab the officers' batons, Andraychak said. At least one officer said protesters attempted unsuccessfully to take her gun.

Andraychak called the actions "an obvious and deliberate attempt" to block the police from entering the building.

The officers responded with batons, striking several protesters, Andraychak said. The officers who were trapped succeeded in freeing themselves, and no arrests were made in that confrontation.

After police entered the bank, several dozen protesters sat on the floor and waited to be arrested. Others left the building and continued marching with the main protest group to the State Building at 455 Golden Gate Ave. for a planned "People's Assembly for Public Education."

Related

By 4 p.m., police had begun arresting protesters in the bank one by one, binding their wrists with plastic handcuffs and leading them to a San Francisco Sheriff's Department bus waiting outside. Protesters who had sat inside the tent were the last to be arrested, and left peacefully.

Because the bank is a private business that is open to the public, the bank's manager had to sign a citizen's arrest form before the police could take action. The adults who were arrested were transported to county jail, issued misdemeanor citations for trespassing, and released.

The march was organized by ReFund California, a coalition of labor groups, in part to protest the cancellation of the UC Board of Regents meeting in San Francisco this week.

According to the regents, the meeting was canceled because of fears that violent protests would occur.

"The 1 percent on the Board of Regents cancelled their meeting because we demanded they do the people's business," read a statement posted on the Occupy SF website about the march.

"So now we're going to where they do Wall Street's business," the statement read.

At 1:30 p.m., about half an hour after the march began, the protesters sat down on Battery Street between Pacific Avenue and Broadway, blocking traffic. Some chanted, "Education must be free. No cuts, no peace."

Elise Youn, a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley, said one of the aims of the march was to "make the connection" between the business interests of certain UC regents and their work on the board.

The marchers were focusing on two regents in addition to Lozano: Richard Blum, the chairman of Blum Capital Partners who is married to Sen. Dianne Feinstein; and George Marcus, who heads a national commercial real estate brokerage firm.

Marchers included a number of students and members of public-sector unions.

The demonstration coincided with a meeting of the California State University's Board of Trustees, who voted 9-6 to increase next year's tuition $498 to $5,970. That meeting, in Long Beach, was disrupted by protesters who stormed into the meeting room, shattering a glass door, the LA Times reported.

Nicole Stefanko, 41, a literacy tutor who was marching in San Francisco, said the fee increase "violates the principle of the public university system. It’s supposed to be free.”

“I don’t think you’re going to find the next geniuses only among the children of the 1 percent," she said. "You need to cast a much wider net.” 

Simone Cardona, 19, a student at the University of California, Santa Cruz, said, "Money could be put into education instead of other things. There’s no sense to saying there’s not money. There is money for education."

The Bay City News Service, Erik Verduzco and Zoe Corneli contributed to this report.

Sandra Whisler
Sandra Whisler
wrote on 11/16/2011 at 4:32 p.m. PST

It may turn out that it was cheaper/easier to keep track of and contain Occupy forces when they were in tent encampments on city property than it is if they are expelled and start acting on/occupying the actual targets--disrupting real business as usual, rather than just burning up a lot of time and money on police overtime. Striking a tent inside of the B of A--brilliant. Seriously causing trouble in banks--provocative and dangerous. So interesting to see what happens next. . .

"Michelle Kohlhaas"
"Michelle Kohlhaas"
wrote on 11/16/2011 at 4:59 p.m. PST

"The marchers were focusing on two regents in addition to Lozano: Richard Blum, chair of Blum Capital Partners; and George Marcus, who heads a national commercial real estate brokerage firm."

Dear Matt Smith:

Are you going to tell us what other position Richard Blum holds? Might be, uh, significant.

Megan Pugh
Megan Pugh
wrote on 11/17/2011 at 8:35 a.m. PST

I wasn't at the SF protests Wednesday, so I can't say for certain, but based on what students and professors were chanting at the protests in Berkeley Tuesday, I suspect you misquoted a key rallying cry. The chant, in my experience, has been "No cuts, no FEES, education must be free"—-not, as you reported, "No cuts, no PEACE." The vast majority of the movement to re-fund public education certainly wants peace. What we don't want are increased fees, layoffs, and the further privatization of public education.

voltairesmistress
voltairesmistress
wrote on 11/17/2011 at 9:45 a.m. PST

This seems like a more effective protest -- entering banks -- than camping out on school campus and city hall plazas. The target, message, and demands are more focused. The political theater certainly more enjoyable!

"Michelle Kohlhaas"
"Michelle Kohlhaas"
wrote on 11/17/2011 at 11:03 a.m. PST

Amen! This is far more to the point, and sidesteps what should be the separate issue of police/community relations.
It also insulates the Occupiers from "battle and tent fatigue" and disease vectors, and preserves and focuses the message.

Stitch_94133
Stitch_94133
wrote on 11/18/2011 at 1:15 p.m. PST

Perhaps if the Occupy folks had bought their tents from Rose Pak they might have been more hospitably received!

Related Content