The Bay Citizen thanks our sponsors
The Bay Citizen thanks our sponsors
Posted in America's Cup

Updated 12/15/2011 at 5:42 p.m. PST

Swimmers to Protest America's Cup by Occupying the Bay

Members of the Dolphin Club object to plans for big boats and a giant floating TV screen

  • Text Size
  • A
  • A
  • A
By on December 15, 2011 - 5:06 p.m. PST
Adithya Sambamurthy/The Bay Citizen
Lou Marcelli, a member of the Dolphin Club, swims in the bay on Monday, February 21, 2011. Marcelli, who is 83 years old, has been a regular Dolphin Club swimmer since 1943

On an overcast, blustery morning at Aquatic Park cove along San Francisco’s northern bay shoreline, the water temperature last week was a chilly 50.5 degrees. The air was only slightly warmer.

As they have been doing since 1877, members of the Dolphin Swimming and Boating Club plunged into the water. About a dozen swimmers, clad only in regular swimwear — no wet suits — did laps from their beachside clubhouse to the other side of the cove and back.

“This water is an attitude adjustment,” said Reuben Hechanova, the club’s president, calling the frigid surf “exhilarating.”

Now some of the club’s 1,200 members believe the city needs an attitude adjustment — and they intend to do exactly that by disrupting plans for the coming America’s Cup yacht races in 2012 and 2013.

Specifically, the swimmers object to a proposal to transform this tranquil cove into party central for the races, complete with a floating giant TV screen. The plan has received preliminary approval.

Evoking recent citizen uprisings on Wall Street and elsewhere, the Dolphins have named their protest Occupy the Bay.

“We don’t want them in the cove,” said Hal Offen, a club member and organizer of the protest. “We don’t want the big boats. We don’t want the Jumbotron.” According to event plans, the television screen would measure 44 feet by 22 feet and sit on a 140-feet-long barge.

Related

While swimmers typically have broad access to the cove, during the months of the America’s Cup competition they are to be restricted to an area around the perimeter. Dolphin Club protesters say that if the city won’t change the plan, they will swim into the cove’s center, a busy area that would also include yachts affiliated with the races, and potentially cause havoc.

“Our real power here is to misbehave, to act up, to occupy,” said Offen, who equated the America’s Cup takeover of the cove as a classic example of the wealthy exerting power over ordinary citizens. “This is a rich person’s sport,” he said, referring to the cup races.

Jackie McEvoy, a club member, said of the yacht race participants: “They want us to see them as athletes. But they are making no effort to treat us as athletes. They’re treating us as a nuisance.”

Beyond hurt feelings or insinuations of class warfare, club members also have environmental concerns.

The video screen barge would most likely be powered by a generator, risking noise and air pollution and fuel spills. It would also need to be securely anchored to withstand winds.

Swimmers are worried that breaching the cove’s floor to secure the barge could dredge up toxins. According to the city’s 3,883-page America’s Cup Environmental Impact Report, the cove was a dumping ground for industrial waste in the 1800s, including material from a lead-processing plant.

In fact, it was the warmth from industrial pollution that first drew bathers to the cove.

“At least as early as the 1880s, bathers congregated in the cove to enjoy its warm waters — the result of heated industrial discharge from nearby facilities,” the report said.

The cove was later a dumping ground for debris from the 1906 earthquake.

But despite these historical accounts that seem to indicate that toxins are most likely buried beneath the cove’s floor, neither the Mayor’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development, which is managing the city’s role in the event, or the America’s Cup Event Authority, the organizer, could answer questions about whether poisons will be dredged up by the video barge’s anchors.

Stephanie Martin, chief communications officer for the authority, said that plans were still being formed and that additional details would emerge in January, “to work toward the best solution for all interested parties.”

Jane Sullivan, a spokeswoman for the city, said, “We’re hopeful we can work out the details to everyone’s satisfaction.”

For Walter Schneebeli, an 86-year-old Dolphin, the only option should be to leave the cove undisturbed. He has been swimming there since he was a child, and still does laps three days a week. In his long, intimate relationship with the bay, Schneebeli said he had never seen the waters so pristine as now.

“I’ve never seen them any cleaner,” he said.

With that at stake, along with 134 years of a hearty, eccentric tradition, it is no wonder the Dolphins are so defiant.

“Unless they have Navy Seals to arrest us,” said Andrew O’Mahony, 25, a club member, “we’re going to keep swimming.”

This article also appears in the Bay Area edition of The New York Times.

Scott James
Scott is a columnist for The Bay Citizen and The New York Times. He has been telling the stories of San Francisco and the Bay Area for nearly 15 years. He founded the underground ezine ... View Profile
Sharon Boschert
Sharon Boschert
wrote on 12/16/2011 at 8:01 a.m. PST

Are the two sides talking to each other? Good story.

Scott James
Scott James
wrote on 12/16/2011 at 8:29 a.m. PST

Hi Sherry,

Thanks for asking.

The Dolphin Club folks spoke out at public hearings over the summer, mostly focused on the disruption to swimming in the cover. And there are more hearings next month.

It's also quite likely that all of this will eventually be up to the Board of Supervisors to consider early next year. That's why organizers say the plans are a work-in-progress.

So we'll see if the concerns about the cove's toxic history get attention and action. By going public with their worries in today's news, the Dolphins have put this out there for discussion.

Stay tuned.

Best,
Scott

"Michelle Kohlhaas"
"Michelle Kohlhaas"
wrote on 12/16/2011 at 8:56 a.m. PST

Great article! I grew up swimming at Aquatic Park, and will support Dolphin Club member efforts.

God bless America; God bless what's left of her pristine waters.

Scott, has anyone noted how unusual it is that this effort stems from the blue-blooded Dolphin Club, and not the soi-disant brawlin', working-class South End Club?

Either way, gotta love real athletes acting on their conscience.

South Enders, rise up and meet the challenge! You gonna let a bunch of preppy Dolphin Club members out-testosterone you in this fight? Get in the water and brawl the yachts!

Douglas Montgomery
Douglas Montgomery
wrote on 12/16/2011 at 1:01 p.m. PST

It's hard to understand this issue if the story doesn't explain the timeline. Apparently the cove will be closed to swimming for "months." I would think it would be closed for race events, which won't take months, but only a few days. Why months?

Nadja Adolf
Nadja Adolf
wrote on 12/16/2011 at 3:28 p.m. PST

Actually, at one time the plans included permanently turning Aquatic Park and other park areas into a yacht basin for large yachts since SF apparently has a shortage of places where one can affordably tie up a two hundred footer. I believe the prolonged closure is planned so that affluent yacht owners can tie up without being annoyed by the citizenry. Why share those views with the poor? They only develop a taste for them and then refuse to live in environmentally responsible high density housing.

"Michelle Kohlhaas"
"Michelle Kohlhaas"
wrote on 12/16/2011 at 3:52 p.m. PST

Good point, Nadja. When I was a kid, there used to be showers at Aquatic Park, so you could wash off the salt water after swimming. Those are now gone, I believe. The notion of a public recreational space for the middle and lower classes have been increasingly eroded.

greg hale
greg hale
wrote on 01/21/2012 at 8:37 a.m. PST

The swim clubs are hardly poor, and I can guarantee not all "yacht" owners are rich. Such reductionist thinking only serves as bomb throwing.

You might consider the other side for a moment, The swimmers in SF bay have been a regular inconvenience to commercial and recreational traffic in the bay for YEARS. i imagine if you tally up the time swimming events have imposed their needs on other bay stakeholders you will find a two month cove closure for the AC to not even register as "sharing."

This is a once in a lifetime sporting event coming to the bay. It will provide thrills as well as jobs. I understand it is the venue o the super rich and their sponsors, but so is baseball, football, soccer etc. and yet those sports seems to provide welcome entertainment to the working poor. After welding and grinding all day and then getting stuck in traffic because of a baseball day game, i try to be philosophical, as opposed to becoming a gadfly ranter.

Sadly, I find the actions of the clubs and its supporters as best to be a move to protect their "private" ocean, and at worst, a vulgar attempt at payola.

More Column Posts

Hold That Bridge! This Dilapidated Warehouse Is a Landmark

On the easternmost tip of Yerba Buena Island, there is a balancing act to behold — one that might impress ......
By Scott James    3/22/12 5:46 p.m. PDT

The Case of a Stolen iPhone at an SFO Security Checkpoint

Jerry Cain put his iPhone into the side pocket of his laptop bag and placed it in the X-ray machine ......
By Scott James    3/15/12 5:34 p.m. PDT

More SF Builders Opting Not to Include Affordable Housing

Construction crews at the corner of 15th and Mission streets in San Francisco are transforming the site of a blighted ......
By Scott James    3/08/12 5:51 p.m. PST

At McDonald’s in the Haight, Calls to Police Have Been Supersized

McDonald’s golden arches famously proclaim “billions and billions served,” but at the restaurant’s beleaguered branch next to San Francisco’s Golden ......
By Scott James    3/01/12 8:35 p.m. PST