San Francisco Aims to Be No. 1 at Dealing with... Number 2
New plan would put eco-friendly, translucent public toilets in parking spaces
An innovative plan would replace some street parking spaces with environmentally friendly public restrooms — facilities that do not flush or connect to the sewer system. Instead, human waste would be collected and someday possibly composted to add back into the ecosystem as plant fertilizer.
The idea is in early development, but an initial restroom could be on the street by spring. Partly inspired by the city’s “parklets” program, which has transformed parking spaces into miniature parks, the proposed curbside restrooms have been nicknamed “pooplets.”
Beyond its green ambitions, the idea — officially called “the ecological toilet project” — could help solve a problem plaguing the city: a lack of public restrooms.
It has been a health concern for decades, tied to the rise of homelessness in the city, which has increased the need for restrooms while causing businesses and government offices to restrict access because of feculence left by transients.
This led to a spike in the use of sidewalks as toilets. In 1985, the columnist Herb Caen, after a malodorous stroll through the downtrodden Tenderloin neighborhood, is said to have quipped that the city could soon be called Latrine-by-the-Bay.
Today, however, it is no joke. There were nearly 10,000 documented “incidents of human waste” cleaned up last year in the Tenderloin alone, according to Dina Hilliard, executive director of the North of Market-Tenderloin Community Benefit District, a neighborhood improvement effort financed by local property owners that pays for sidewalk cleaning.
“This is out of control,” Hilliard said of the waste.
Ideas for solving the problem — like portable toilets or renting out a storefront with facilities — were determined too unsightly, problematic or expensive.
The eco-restrooms in parking spaces would offer a different approach.
The restrooms are the vision of Hyphae Design Laboratory of Oakland and its founder, Brent Bucknum, who helped create the celebrated living roof at the California Academy of Sciences in Golden Gate Park. The science behind them is already used in developing countries: solid and liquid wastes are separated, reducing smells and the risk of disease. No toxic chemicals are used, making it possible to eventually transform waste into plant nutrients (although initially, in San Francisco, it would be trucked to waste treatment facilities).
“We have to deal with this lack of public facilities, and the lack of public decency,” Bucknum said.
Bucknum said the public’s suggestions would go into the final design, but several features are part of the preliminary concept, including ultraviolet lights to destroy germs and to act as “lanterns” to attract patrons.
To thwart vandalism and misuse, like drug use or prostitution (problems that have besieged 25 green JCDecaux kiosk restrooms since they were installed in the city beginning in 1996), the washing facilities would be on the outside of the structure.
And the walls could be translucent, making abstract silhouettes of people using the restroom visible from outside, allowing the police to note any illegal activity.
The cost would be $40,000 to $50,000 each. Hyphae, together with the community benefit district, is financing the prototype restroom. If successful, Bucknum said he hoped the city would pay for others, perhaps to provide relief to the crowds expected for the 2013 America’s Cup yacht races. The restrooms are intended to be free.
It’s not just the homeless who feel the dearth of public restrooms. Facilities at BART and Muni stations, with thousands of transit passengers daily, have been closed for years because of what officials say are security and maintenance concerns.
The 2010 California Plumbing Code indicates that transit stations, and businesses that serve the public, must provide customer restrooms, according to Lynne Simnick of the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, a professional group that helps carry out construction standards.
“They have to have them — there is no choice,” she said.
But Simnick said the rules were difficult to enforce and might not cover older buildings. Regardless, she said, “a business is supposed to be serving their patrons.”
Not everyone sees it that way. Last week on Haight Street, a destination for tourists and transients alike, a female friend’s request to use the restroom was denied at 7 out of 10 randomly selected shops. One sympathetic clerk said she had been told to pretend that the restroom was broken whenever customers asked to use it.
It’s a situation that most seem to accept. City building and health inspectors said they received few complaints about customers being denied restrooms.
However, for the homeless, who have little choice but to use the streets, the need for a solution is urgent. Perhaps soon a curbside “lantern” illuminating a silhouette could show the way.
This article also appears in the Bay Area edition of The New York Times.







Jane Lloyd
This idea is brilliant and LONG OVERDUE. It is infuriating that there are NO restrooms in BART or Muni. FTF??
Andrew Ferguson
OMG! could this be a more terrible idea?!
The folks who use the alleys etc in which to do their business aren't going to run around looking for a translucent toilet in a parking space.
Shoppers, business people aren't going to want to use a toilet which has just been vacated by a bum who has had diarrhea all over the seat.
In order for this to even begin to work, the toilets would have to go IN the alleys and IN the Muni and BART stations, not in parking spaces.
Look, people gotta go when they gotta go, and no amount of trying to force them to be responsible/respectful about it is going to make it otherwise.
At $40-$50K each, plus paying for daily or twice daily maintenance, it'd be just as cost-effective to supervise the BART/Muni toilets.
And - oh yeah - who's supposed to have the job of maintaining-supervising-cleaning these eco-wonder toilets?
Since so many other things than cars are going in to parking spaces, perhaps they should be called by another name.
Michael Chorost
Nice column, Scott. On a recent trip to St. Petersburg, in Russia, I saw a bus that had been converted into a rolling restroom. It got electricity from somewhere and there was a hose snaking down into a nearby sewer. It cost 75 cents to use, and it was clean. There were two buses, actually, one for men and one for women. It was a terrific idea.
Carol McCreary
Urine-diverting dry toilets (UDDT) hold enormous promise for global food security and food safety. They can facilitate safe excreta reuse in agriculture and avoid the spreading of toxic sewage sludge on farmland.
While UDDTs are ecologically compelling, they are socially challenging: changes in toileting habits do not come easily. No-mix toilets are more easily introduced in the home but prevailing building codes still make this impossible.
There is so much to learn in the area of toilet technology and engaging the community in design of public facilities is the way to go. Journalists and citizen advocates have their work cut out. Public Hygiene Lets Us Stay Human, or PHLUSH, works to bring clean safe public toilets to Portland, Oregon. We'll be following developments in San Francisco and invite activists there to follow us on www.phlush.org
Esperanza McKee
The headline is not accurate. A non--SF design firm proposed its plan to a community sub-district. That's all. I'm so tired of newspapers hyping novelties. If that area wanted toilets for $50k a pop, it would have the big portable high-capacity pumpout toilets or a 3-john toilet facility that flushes to the city sewer. Public toilets need a lot of cleaning and can easily end up being residences and drug exchange spaces. They need to be planned with that in mind. Many of us walk the 4 extra blocks to Safeway or Whole Foods to use the public restrooms.
Howard Epstein
ROTFLMAO. These will be vandalized and useless within a month.
What is the cost to the taxpayers to empty and clean these on a daily basis.
Henry Lynn
Okay, San Francisco, I get it, you don't want people with cars to visit anymore. Fine, I'll go take my business to Oakland instead.