Supes Approve Paper Bag Fee, Expand Plastic Bag Ban


Creative Commons/Anca Mosoiu

A proposal to institute a fee for each paper bag provided at a store in San Francisco and also expand the city's ban on plastic bags was unanimously approved by the Board of Supervisors Tuesday.

Starting this October, the legislation will institute a 10-cent fee for each bag provided by any retail establishment to customers. Restaurants will also be required to charge the fee starting in October 2013.

The city's 2007 ban on supermarkets and chain store pharmacies providing single-use, non-compostable plastic bags is expanding as well to include all retail stores in October, then restaurants the following year.

The businesses charging the fee will keep the money to use how they see fit, and the plastic bag ban will include certain exemptions, such as "doggy bags" used to take home leftover food from restaurants.

Before supervisors voted on the ordinance, board President David Chiu introduced an amendment to provide additional exemptions that will allow the use of plastic bags for various delicate or heavy items, and another to require further outreach by the city's Department of the Environment.

"All of us have heard that we still have to do more" to educate residents and merchants about the new law, Chiu said.

Department of the Environment director Melanie Nutter said her department had reached 23 different neighborhood and merchant groups to talk about the legislation and has outreach workers that speak several different languages.

Nutter said the department has also set aside money and is working with corporate partners to provide a reusable bag giveaway in the city.

"We're poised and ready as a department ... for the next seven months" when the law will go into effect, she said.

Supervisor Carmen Chu said she is aware that there are many people who see San Francisco as a city that "nickels and dimes every single thing" and that a lack of outreach could create "a lot of confusion and bad feelings."

The vote on the proposal had been delayed for two months while more outreach was done.

During that time, the legislation's author, then-Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi -- who also authored the 2007 law -- was sworn in as the city's new sheriff and Christina Olague was appointed as his replacement.

Olague took over as a sponsor of the ordinance and expressed support of it before the vote.

"The only effective way to change the behavior of most customers is to institute a charge," she said, adding that the law will cut down on private and public costs of disposing of bags and is "a crucial next step" toward the city's zero waste goal by 2020.

The board voted 10-0 in favor of the proposal. Supervisor David Campos missed Tuesday's meeting due to an illness.

The ordinance will return in front of the board next week for final approval and then go to the mayor's desk for signature.

SF Ocean Edge
SF Ocean Edge
wrote on 02/08/2012 at 3:36 p.m. PST

It is ironic that while San Francisco is trying to save the environment by eliminating plastic bags, the City is also planning to destroy the environment in Golden Gate Park by replacing over 7 acres of real grass and living top soil (including earthworms and all of the wonderful living entities that are part of the ecosystem) with over 7 acres of artificial turf -- gravel base, plastic grass, and tire waste or other infill. The Audubon Society has referred to this as the environmental equivalent of installing a 7 acre asphalt parking lot!

The Beach Chalet project is headed for approval in a few months. Let the Mayor and the BOS know that plastic is plastic -- coloring plastic green does not make it real grass! Golden Gate Park is the wrong place for this project.

Katherine Howard, SF Ocean Edge

Northwest Mission
Northwest Mission
wrote on 02/10/2012 at 8:11 p.m. PST

Oh, come off it. Registering your indignation by making tenuous connections between an article and your pet cause is not informative. It's spam.

There's no irony in the scenario of putting in some artificial turf onto a play field with respect to the city's stance on plastic bags. No matter what is on the field, it's an artificial construct. A bunch of thirsty grass next to the sand dunes doesn't make for good environmental stewardship, either.

SF Ocean Edge
SF Ocean Edge
wrote on 02/11/2012 at 11:01 p.m. PST

Golden Gate Park's meadows are a rich, living environment for many species. That is why the Sierra Club and the Audubon Society are fighting to protect the Beach Chalet Athletic Fields. For the Draft Environmental Impact Report, Audubon submitted a list of over 64 birds that have been seen by just one volunteer at the Beach Chalet Fields. It is exciting to go out there and see the hawks or the herons hunting; many smaller birds also feed on the fields; during stormy weather, shore birds come in. But artificial turf is dead -- it does not provide habitat for wildlife. And on top of that, the 60 foot sports lights will have an additional negative impact on the habitat for most birds and other wildlife.

One reads a lot of articles about how great San Francisco is doing with environmental policies. The plastic bags cause negative impacts worldwide, and the ban is a small but good start on changing that. But Golden Gate Park is right here! When it comes to protecting a major habitat area, the City is turning its back on it.

There are alternatives to this project, which we encourage everyone to consider, so that we can have a win-win solution.

Add a Comment

Join the Conversation

Not a member yet? Register Now

You must sign in to post a comment.

or